Although the future can’t be predicted, it is important to think about the variety of futures one hopes to see and those they would prefer to not come true.
This forecast describes four future worlds where students are assessed differently. The worlds sit in corners of a quadrant informed by two ideas we call “critical uncertainties:”
- How will we measure quality? Will it be system-based or classroom-based?
- How will we use AI in assessment? Will it be pre-programmed or flexible?
Learn more about these critical uncertainties, or dive into Celia, Jayden, Alejandro, or Kendra’s worlds, where these ideas play out in very different ways through stories and vivid scenes about the possible futures of assessment.
Celia’s World
Where formative assessment is discretionary
Asset-based formative assessment is an adaptable strategy that is leveraged by school and district leaders seeking to develop mastery of 22nd century learning competencies.
Jayden’s World
Where formative assessment is automated
Asset-based formative assessment is embedded into a comprehensive, automated learning environment that is designed to streamline equitable outcomes for all learners.
Alejandro’s World
Where formative assessment is joyous
Asset-based formative assessment provides the foundation for new educational systems and structures that center learner agency in a comprehensive, community-based learning ecosystem.
Kendra’s World
Where formative assessment is compassionate
Asset-based formative assessment leverages an automated approach to support a developmental and individualized learning progression.